tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7195371530559081144.post4834543204230788140..comments2024-01-05T00:35:39.840-08:00Comments on On Second Look: “Sorcerer”- (1977) Dir- William FriedkinWayne Wilentzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02292491371377961757noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7195371530559081144.post-83306974113440276422015-07-19T08:46:06.540-07:002015-07-19T08:46:06.540-07:00I still like the film, and I don't have a prob...I still like the film, and I don't have a problem with the title. The comments as to why the film did not do as well as hoped seem disingenuous to me. The show has constant tension and great acting. Not to mention the denouement is anything but boring.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7195371530559081144.post-41058602665613494802013-07-03T14:23:46.981-07:002013-07-03T14:23:46.981-07:00It's not an "action" movie, although...It's not an "action" movie, although there is some of that, but it's more complex than the typical action movie.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10194213204358238187noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7195371530559081144.post-60738273659970416292013-06-27T10:29:20.401-07:002013-06-27T10:29:20.401-07:00Great action, paper thin characters.Great action, paper thin characters.Andrea Ostrov Letaniahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13478113002321077670noreply@blogger.com